Service three of three

One working session that tells you exactly where your brand and packaging fall short on shelf.

This is Murevix's brand audit service for a business that already has an identity and packaging in market and needs an outside read before committing to a redesign. It's a flat fee, one-time working session — not an open-ended review, and not a substitute for the identity or packaging services if the answer turns out to be a rebuild.

Consultant and client reviewing printed packaging comparison sheets at a table
Working session, comparison sheets on the tableNot a written report mailed later

What the session covers

An audit at Murevix is a working session against physical comparisons, not a slide deck of opinions. Before the session, the studio pulls examples from the category the client names — direct competitors, adjacent brands on the same shelf, and at least one aspirational reference outside the category. During the session, the client's identity and packaging get laid out next to those comparisons and reviewed piece by piece.

  • Shelf-distance readHow the mark and packaging read from six feet, the distance most shoppers actually see it at, compared against the category set.

  • Color and contrast checkWhether the current color system stands out or disappears against the specific shelf, cooler, or platform background named for the session.

  • Consistency check between identity and packagingWhether the logo, type and color used on packaging actually match the documented identity, or have drifted from it over time — a common failure the studio sees on brands past their first few years.

  • Written priority listA short, ranked list of what to fix first, handed over at the end of the session, not mailed a week later.

Comparison method

Judged next to the shelf, not in the abstract

The studio keeps a rotating set of unbranded structural comparisons — boxes, pouches, bottles of varying shapes — used to demonstrate structural options without pointing at any one competitor's actual packaging. Combined with the client's own named category set, this lets the audit talk about real shelf dynamics without the session turning into a copyright problem or a guessing game about a competitor's exact print specs.

This comparison discipline is the same one used across every Murevix engagement, not something invented for the audit. See how it carries into a full project on the Packaging Design & Structure page.

Row of unbranded packaging shapes arranged on a shelf for comparison
Unbranded structural comparisons, kept on handUsed for shape and scale reference only

What the audit does

  • Compares your current mark and packaging directly against named category competitors, in the room, during the session.
  • Flags where identity and packaging have drifted apart from each other over time.
  • Hands over a ranked priority list of fixes before the session ends.
  • Gives a plain answer on whether a refresh, a full rebuild, or no change at all is the right next step.

What the audit does not do

  • It does not produce new design work. No logo revision, no packaging layout, no dieline — that's the identity or packaging service, quoted separately if the audit points that way.
  • It does not promise a sales outcome. Murevix ships an honest comparison and a priority list; what happens on shelf afterward is between your team and your retailer.
  • It is not an open-ended engagement. One session, one flat fee, one written list. Follow-on work gets its own scope and its own quote.

Who books this instead of a full project

A brand and packaging agency conversation usually starts one of two ways: a business knows exactly what's wrong and wants it fixed, or a business suspects something's off but can't name it precisely. Some of these sessions turn into a packaging design consultant engagement once the shelf comparison makes the structural problem obvious; plenty of others end with the identity untouched and a shorter list than the client expected. The audit exists for the second case. It's also the right entry point for a rebranding consultant conversation with a small business that isn't ready to commit to a six-week identity project but needs a clear-eyed second opinion first.

If the session concludes that the packaging structure itself is the problem — not just the graphics — that gets said plainly, and the next step is a packaging quote, not a vague recommendation to "refresh the look." If the session concludes nothing needs to change yet, that gets said too. The studio has ended audit sessions telling a client to keep what they have and put the budget elsewhere.

Not sure the audit is the right size?

If you already know you need a new mark or a new structure, skip straight to the identity or packaging service. If you're not sure which, the project finder takes less time than reading this page twice.

Use the project finder